|
The Scientist: NewsBlog:
How biotechs get on CSI
Posted by Alison McCook [Entry posted at 24th January 2008 11:44 PM GMT]
Rate this article
Return to Top comment: Promega's Maxwell instrument used on CSI as well.... by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2008-01-27 14:47:24] to extract perp's DNA from a sweat droplet on a leaf near the crime scene. Return to Top comment: Interesting choice of name for a company. by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2008-01-27 05:48:40] Who exactly came up with the name AnalTech?
Return to Top comment: It's Showbiz!!! by Mike Thomas [Comment posted 2008-01-25 21:43:42] Hopefully most viewers will realise that drama is not reality. After all in the legal shows lawyers seem to be able to get clearly guilty clients off all the time. If that were true you wouldn't need plea bargaining. I think CSI are to be commended for being as realistic as they can within the constraints of their timeslot. Return to Top comment: CSI not always helpful to scientists by anonymous poster [Comment posted 2008-01-25 13:27:30] My boss, a branch chief for an analytical chemistry group for a federal agency, received a request for CSI for details for one of their episodes on something he has been working on. During the course of their discussion, he complained that CSI, although quite accurate in their presentation of instrumentation, stretches the truth, when the time and difficulty of getting information out of this equipment is glossed over. On the show answers are arrived at in seconds or minutes as opposed to hours or days, as usually happens in the real world. The consultant said that they get that complain from scientists all the time. Consequently, this depiction does no service to scientists, who try to communicate this complexity to the general public. Comment on this blog |