TheScientist.com - Magazine of the Life Sciences, Every Day, Online
  Please Login or Register
  • Home
  • Community
  • Current Issue
  • Browse Archive
  • Careers
  • Video & Multimedia
  • Subscribe

Front Cover
Advertisement
Front Cover
Supplements
  • Life Sciences in
    the Greater
    Phila. Region
  • Schizophrenia
  • NC: State of the Life Sciences
  • Autoimmunity


Survey Series
  • Best Places to Work
  • $alary $urvey
  • Lab Web Site and
    Video Awards

The Scientist Daily
  • Science headlines delivered daily.
    Register today.

For Advertisers
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact Ad Team
  • 2009 Media Kit



by Praxis Press

RESEARCH ROUND-UP

Calcium-channel blockers and hypertension
Calcium-channel blockers and older drugs both prevent hypertension-related morbidity and mortality.


News from The Scientist 2000, 1(1):20000801-04

Published 1 August 2000

NEW YORK, July 31 (Praxis Press) Cardiovascular outcomes have not been compared in hypertensive patients treated with calcium channel blockers and in patients treated with older drugs. Hansson and colleagues compared morbidity and mortality in 5,410 hypertensive patients randomized to diltiazem treatment and in 5,471 hypertensive patients randomized to treatment with diuretics, beta-blockers, or both. Both regimens effectively lowered systolic and diastolic blood pressure, although diuretics and beta-blockers more markedly lowered systolic blood pressure (P < 0.001). The combined primary endpoint of all stroke, myocardial infarction, and other cardiovascular death occurred with similar frequencies in both groups (relative risk, 1.00; P = 0.97). In another study, Brown and colleagues compared outcomes in 3,157 hypertensive patients randomized to treatment with long-acting nifedipine and in 3,164 hypertensive patients randomized to treatment with the diuretic combination co-amilozide. The combined primary outcome of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and stroke occurred with similar frequencies in both groups (relative risk, 1.10, P = 0.35). Discontinuation was more likely among nifedipine-treated patients (P < 0.0001) because of peripheral edema, but co-amilozide-treated patients were more likely to suffer serious adverse effects (P = 0.02). Nifedipine-treated patients had higher rates of non-fatal heart failure (P = 0.028) and fatal myocardial infarction (P = 0.017), although all-cause mortality was similar for the two groups (P = 0.81).


 

Email

Password

> Forgot Password?
> FAQ
> Subscribe

 
Not yet registered? Get free access
 

Subscribing to The Scientist is easy and inexpensive.

 

And you can choose from many options. Try us out with an online day pass starting at only $4.95. Or, get it all with unlimited online access to The Scientist Archive and door-to-door delivery of our monthly print magazine.

 
  Not yet registered? Get free access  
 

The Scientist also offers site licenses to institutions and organizations. When your librarian adds The Scientist to the library's collection, you can get unlimited online access through your place of work or study.
Recommend The Scientist today

 



About TS | Contact | Advertise | Editorial Advisory Board | Privacy Policy
© 1986-2008 The Scientist